Search This Blog

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

GREG'S FIENDISHLY DIFFICULT CRYPTIC CHRISTMAS QUIZ

No Cribs or Yule Log tables allowed... Write on one side of the wrapping paper only; answers by Twelfth Night please. Will be posted on my blog then:

Section 1 Seasonal Transport

  1. Sounds vulgar but wet and expensive way to kill.
  2. Destination Cairo airport
  3. Spanish writer rode one called "oatie".
  4. Fore (-1)noon floaters
  5. Rev Awdrey's No.1 annually pulls this.

Section 2 Famous Names and People

  1. Seasonally fearful actor / playwright
  2. Second generation old fashioned roofing worker
  3. Mr. Blobby's Christmas companion
  4. One out of Matthew 2 and the other out of North Lancashire
  5. An old Ambridge family - archer than the others in Luke.

Section 3 Food and Drink

  1. One country is useful for basting another
  2. Shoplifter takes German cake
  3. Espionage in the polo factory coins a fortune
  4. Thought at length about an unpleasant noise
  5. Thankfully there are few of these famous Belgians.

Section 4 Christmas Songs

  1. includes numeorus jumping peers and a twitchers list
  2. Kelloggs cereals may melt in the mouth
  3. Royal Boxing Day expedition
  4. Seasonal night visions about needles, cowes to ride and new port
  5. Leyton Triple Crown

Section 5 Christmas Traditions.

  1. thrush on the foot may be embarrassing to some
  2. a card game without any birthdays
  3. sounds like a prison made of Cornish metal
  4. two evergreen female names
  5. tinkerbelle ain't heavy
  6. circular avian letter
  7. Officers dine upstairs because of their elevated status, while the composer is on the way out
  8. Liturgical name of indeterminate gender causes extremities to do this when snowballing
  9. Northern trousers play without words but still lose their voice
  10. Measure in kg in a stable environment

Monday, December 24, 2007

Charles Wesley born 300 years ago : A seasonal Hymn

 

1 LET earth and heaven combine, Angels and men agree, To praise in songs divine The incarnate Deity, Our God contracted to a span, Incomprehensibly made man.

2 He laid his glory by, He wrapped him in our clay; Unmarked by human eye, The latent Godhead lay; Infant of days he here became, And bore the mild Immanuel's name.

3 Unsearchable the love That hath the Saviour brought; The grace is far above Or man or angels thought; Suffice for us that God, we know, Our God, is manifest below.

4 He deigns in flesh to appear, Widest extremes to join; To bring our vileness near, And make us all divine: And we the life of God shall know, For God is manifest below.

5 Made perfect first in love, And sanctified by grace, We shall from earth remove, And see his glorious face: Then shall his love be fully showed, And man shall then be lost in God.


 

I'm protected by SpamBrave

Friday, December 14, 2007

PRESTON CITY COUNCIL ASKED THESE QUESTIONS FOR PCN MEMBERS TO CONSIDER.....

This is my response
 
You asked for responses to the questions below... Sorry to sound so negative and politically critical but at Christmas as a follower of one who was born homeless and soon became a refugee and in the words of the Bible
 
2 Corinthians 8:9
For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, so that you through his poverty might become rich

I have to say in response...(on the basis that I take equality to be primarily about economics and power, while I recognise there are structural inequalities correlated with gender, ethnicity, faith, disability etc....)
 
      1.              Can you identify any barriers to access to the groups you work with, to Preston City Council services?

The biggest barrier is the huge gap between people facing homelessness, poverty worklessness and lack of education and the official world with its commuting high paid professionals, administrative gobbledegook and procedures, and its buying in to the punitive and controlling culture of the present government. With the little chance of real help the Council can offer and the risk of losing what little resources, freedom and dignity poor people possess, it's not surprising many of them are very reluctant to approach any officialdom.

 

 

 2.                   How can the services and functions of Preston City Council better promote equality? 

 

They can't unless there is a huge political change at the national and local level which stops the obscene and growing gap between the super rich and the poor.

3.                   Can you identify any area of existing good practice within Preston City Council's services? 

 

Not really...   though there must be some as there are some genuinely committed and caring people among the staff and members of the Council...   who make genuine efforts to help and empower local people.. eg. through some of the processes of neighbourhood management...

 

4.                   What else do you think Preston City Council can do to promote equality, both in service provision, and more widely? 

 

Spend less time doing deals with the Duke of Westminster and his sort of capitalists and devote its resources to justice and equality for the poor who live in our community.



 

I'm protected by SpamBrave

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

My Christmas Card


Friday, December 07, 2007

Annual Report to Stakeholders for 2007 from the Smith Family In Preston

2007 has proved a reasonably successful year for our company, though it is as well that we are a strictly not for profit social enterprise, as takings have been slightly less than outgoings, and belts have become tighter all round. Some analysts suggest this might be due to rapid expansion, fuelled by over eager consumption of high value calorific items, even prior to the Yuletide season. Forecasts for the New Year suggest there will need to be investment in Boots (made for walking), a new turn in the economic cycle, and trading in Rosemary Conley derivative products.
 
Nonetheless our board members and principal shareholders all remain in good heart, robust health a general contentment. Our senior partners have been in the firm now for about 18 years. Greg still manages the IT department, and the vegetable production section, while Jane continues to serve as director of finance, and domestic engineering. Outside the corporate HQ Jane has moved to a new post as a group worker for Lancashire Probation Service, while Greg is paid to do community work by The Salvation Army in Preston, but does much else besides.
 
Our first junior partner Marcus, after achieving  some creditable results in recent tests has become an advanced level instructee at Runshaw college, and undertakes occasional lucrative external consultancies with a catering firm. The second junior partner Martha is worthy of her post as creative director, deeply involved in external networking, though the management sometimes question her understanding of cost control and gasp with incredulity at the monthly expense claims she submits. Finally there is our non-executive director, and mostly sleeping partner Pawz, who despite being three years old continues to act like a puppy and eat like a voracious tyrannosaurous.
 
Our coporate commitment to our local parish church remains strong, with a portfolio of directorships, responsibilities and (ethical) investments which are rewarding and encouraging.
 
For an illustrated guide to some of the things we have been up to  (especially Greg) and some of the places we have been, Please explore this blog and the following web links:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

I'm protected by SpamBrave

Friday, November 09, 2007

RECENT PHOTOS FOR YOUR ENJOYMENT

 
At http://picasaweb.google.com/gregmaistersmith   you'll find some of my best recent photos in the following almums
 
 
 
 
Lake district / Coniston    http://picasaweb.google.com/gregmaistersmith/LakeDistrict  (at bottom of album)
 
 
 
Blackpool Iluminations   http://picasaweb.google.com/gregmaistersmith/Blackpool  (at bottom of album)

I'm protected by SpamBrave

Ribble Barrage .. an alternative plan

In view of the news that the daft plan for a barrage on the Ribble has been "put on ice" see



http://www.lep.co.uk/news/Barrage-plan-put-on-ice.3451802.jp



I've written to the leader of the city council thus:




Dear Cllr. Hudson,

I was pleased to read in the LEP yesterday that plans for a proposed river barrage have at least been put on the back burner, and I would hope that it is indeed sunk without trace.

As a local resident with some experience in the world of regeneration and an interest in a sustainable environment I would suggest this decision offers the city a golden opportunity to develop a plan for the whole of the Ribble flood plain that could bring huge benefits to local people, wildlife and the economy. In the context of wider strategic plans why not seek to get the whole of the undeveloped / green part of the flood plain from the Tickled Trout, downstream to Longton marsh to be designated as a Country park / nature reserve / green corridor at the heart of Central Lancashire?

The arguments for this are environmental and recreational. Even though the area should essentially remain greenbelt, there could be some minimal development like improving pathways for walkers and cyclists, more interpretation boards or a field studies centre and more marketing so that the area is used more by local people and attracts visitors. I’m sure it would be worthwhile developing partnerships involving not only Preston and South Ribble Councils, but sports associations (football, canoeing, cycling etc.), the wildlife trust, the RSPB and even the cafes and pubs along the way. Sounds like a great opportunity waiting to be grasped, and the tidal flowing Ribble would be the central feature. There are similar models of riverside country parks which are worth looking at, for example the Nene Valley in Peterborough and the Mersey Valley Park nearer to home. I’d be interested to hear what you think of such an idea, and delighted if you could get your officers looking into it.


Yours sincerely


Greg Smith



For some of my latest photos of the river and surroundin area go to



http://picasaweb.google.com/gregmaistersmith/RibbleThroughPreston



You'll find the new ones at the bottom of the album

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Curse of the Google Vanity Search Brings Identity Crisis.

 
Dear Greg, & Greg, & Greg (that's me)
 
Oh the curse of the google vanity search.. I type in my own name and of course I get several hits... over a million to be precise .. the top four are these.. Well at least the top one is me..see below.
 
I discovered the (ranked at number 2) Greg Smith who is a sociologist at Salford a few years ago which was more than a co-incidence as I was at the time earning my living at the University of East London as a Social Researcher...
 
But the new (number 3) Greg Smith I've found he is hardly my alter ego.. a Tory Councillor in Hammersmith, who has been appointed Cabinet member for Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour. . With my politics being far to the left of anything left behind in the Labour Party..I must say I'm not surprised... on my list being a Conservative Councillor counts pretty much as a crime and anti social behaviour even if you don't make it to the cabinet.. and of course it has to be him who's grabbed the domain name http://www.gregsmith.co.uk/
 
The number 4 Greg Smith sounds more like me... an environmental scientist (I'm an environmental cyclist!) and working at my old alma mater.. the University of Reading... He even works in the Harry Pitt building, named after the Vice Chancellor of my days (early 70's) whom we used to refer to as the "BOTTOMLESS PITT". 
 
I don't believe in reincarnation, or even in parallel universes but the proliferation of names sakes makes me think I'd better find out how to apply to copyright my identity, or register my name as a trademark. Still I don't think it adds any weight to the oppressive government plan to bring in ID cards and take DNA samples from everyone.. But as soon as I say that I'm sounding too much like a Tory!
 
 
For reference the top four UK googleable Gregs are..
 

Greg Smith UEL Home Page

Greg Smith's Urban Mission and Minstry Pages · Credo Consultancy Business Web Site Helping churches and community groups with research, information and ...
homepages.uel.ac.uk/G.Smith/ - 10k - Cached - Similar pages
 
 

The University of Salford | Institute for Social, Cultural and ...

Dr Greg Smith, BSc (Salford), PhD (Salford) ... School of English, Sociology, Politics & Contemporary History. Email: g.w.h.smith@salford.ac.uk ...
www.iscpr.salford.ac.uk/people/staff/gregory_smith.shtml - 18k - Cached - Similar pages

Greg Smith - Councillor for Town Ward & Cabinet Member for Crime ...

Greg Smith is one of three Councillors who represent Town Ward in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham. He serves alongside Councillor Stephen ...
gregsmith.co.uk/ - 11k - Cached - Similar pages

Greg Smith's Home Page

Greg Smith, Research Fellow, Environmental Systems Science Centre.
www.nerc-essc.ac.uk/~gcs/ - 9k - Cached - Similar pages
 
 

I'm protected by SpamBrave

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Letter to MP re end of local bus services

Dear Mr Hendrick,

According to the Lancashire Evening Post

Preston Bus has revealed it has been forced into the first "retreat" of the city's bus wars.
The operator confirmed it is making sweeping cuts across its services as it battles Stagecoach for customers on its most popular routes.It has axed service number 21 to Broadgate, the 36 to Lightfoot Lane via Garstang Road and the twice-daily number 99 bus to the Royal Preston Hospital.


This leaves our community in Broadgate without a viable bus service which as a result of a mass local campaign three years ago was promised to be maintained. Furthermore the Council at that time instituted a one way system between South Meadow Lane and Riverside in order to make the route more viable. The bus service remains vital, especially to the many elderly people who live in the area.

Apparently the route has been cut because it is uneconomic and the rampant capitalist competition between rival bus companies. I am old enought to remember the campaigns of the 1980s against Thatcher's evil policies to privatise and deregulate public transport. Preston is now reaping the whirlwind of the failure of those campaigns.

But why on earth after 10 years in power has not your Labour government reversed the legislation, and put public service above economics? The question is even more relevant given what we now know about the devastation to the environment caused by among other things dependency on the private motor car.

Greg Smith

RECENT PHOTOS

Mainline Steam Trains in the NW July 28th

More at http://picasaweb.google.com/gregmaistersmith/NorthernSteamJuly282007



Union of South Africa approaches Oxenholme


Holiday photos from the Moray Firth Scotland at



Bow & Fiddle Rocks Portknockie


Lake district landscapes at




NW from Windermere




Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Another Daft government Policy

I Had a destitute Romanian across my path today..

How crazy that they and Bulgarians can be here legally as EU nationals yet with no right to seek employment nor to claim on public funds.

see an outline of the situation on http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5381990.stm

He'd even been thrown out of a homeless night shelter because they could not claim housing benefit on his behalf!!

Monday, May 28, 2007

Running Wild in Broadgate

Back in the early spring a local open space back of South Beech Street was tidied up by Groundwork as part of their Small sites in west preston scheme. It looked really good, overgrown shrubs cleared out, litter remove, ground cover plants planted and all topped with a layer of woodchip mulch. Ir was an Avencentral SRB6 project so their logo got stuck up on some nice signs, designed by local school kids.

But look at it today 3 months on...




Why has it deteriorated so quickly...
There has been some deliberate damage with some plants ripped up.. probabbly by bored and possibly drunken people.. And maybe the choice of plants and quality of weed root removal was not good when the work was done
But the real problem is lack of maintenance... Why?
Because it was a short term project... Groundwork's funding came to an end on March 31st. and their staff are no longer around.. In an ideal world they would have left behind a community group to look after the place... But why should anyone want to work hard gardening a public space when we pay the Council to do that and we are all busy anyway? And the community development was just not done in the original project.
Formally the city council has the responsibility for maintaining the area.. But they are always and increasingly hard pressed for staff and funds.. If its not a high prestige area then they are going to neglect it.
So its yet another example of a short term scheme based on funny regeneration money ending up being a waste of effort, because there was no continuation funding...

Friday, April 27, 2007

The Lie and The Acts of Tony Blair

In our recent home group Bible study we looked at the story of Ananias and Sapphira in.

Acts 4:32 - 5:11

It’s a frightening story if you take seriously the idea of the judgment of God against sin, be it in this world as in the Bible story or in the world to come. Our group concluded as many Bible scholars have before that the sin that made the apostles so angry was not so much the selfishness and lack of generosity that caused the guilty couple to keep back some of their wealth for themselves, but their deceit and hypocrisy when they made out that they were handing over the full value of their property to the fund for the relief of poverty. Indeed it is this lie and deceit, reflecting the character of Satan, the father of all lies, that is the sin against the Holy Spirit which as Jesus taught cannot be forgiven.

We all need to acknowledge as Isaiah did that “I am a person of unclean lips, and I dwell among a people of unclean lips.” This is especially necessary if we are to go on to critique others for their apparent deceit. There is always the possibility that we may be wrong in our judgments, or too harsh, for ultimately there is only one just judge, who sees all things clearly, that is the Lord God himself. But at least that confession of fallibility clears the way for us to speak the truth as we see it, in anger perhaps yet in love and concern and sadness as we see the possibility of a day of reckoning approaching.

I find it hard not to consider how this story compares with the present political situation in the UK.

A dozen or more years ago many of us were utterly fed up with Tory sleaze and their misguided policies. We were overwhelmingly cynical when Jonathan Aitken spoke of the “sword of truth” even as he was being convicted and jailed in a perjury trial. Ironically many years later he appears to have come out of it all quite well, as a repentant siner and changed character having found faith in Jesus.

Ten years ago on that bright May morning I, with many others who had stayed up through election night, and cheered heartily as Tory ministers and MPs (especially Michael Portillo) were unseated, we hoped it was a new dawn, and joined in the song that “things can only get better”. Personally, even then I was not totally convinced.

I had joined the Labour Party in Newham in 1980, and been active in it through all the Thatcher years. I’d been a branch chair and secretary, campaigned at every local and National Election and even considered going for selection as a councilor (In Newham it was selection that mattered not election as the “monkey with a red rose will always win” rule always applied.). Some of my friends got on the Council, one eventually became Leader, did some good things with a deft touch and eventually became MP.

In 1992 after campaigning at the general election, with a baby son I’d helped produce especially for Labour candidates to kiss, that despite the polls, I was devastated we lost again and John Major was back in Downing Street.

After that my enthusiasm waned. I was never a great fan of John Smith and when he died I soon understood that the young Tony Blair looked like a winner, and have to admit I gave him my vote in the leadership election. But from then on it was downhill all the way. Disillusion set in as I realised that even if Labour won the next election it wouldn’t make much difference, at least not on the great issues of poverty and justice at home and overseas. So it was that my activism died, I failed to renew my Party membership, and I played no part in the 1997 campaign. Ten years on I can’t even remember if I voted for them, but if I did I’m pretty certain it was the last time.

And now exactly a decade later it seems that Mr. Blair is packing his bags and about to leave Downing Street. And I am not just a half hearted reluctant fellow traveler as I was in 1997. I have instead become utterly and absolutely opposed to everything New Labour stands for, and to almost everything they have done or failed to do. I am convinced I will never vote for that party again, and am amazed that anyone else can contemplate doing so.

What has caused this? Above all I would say it is the culture of The Lie that has been at the heart of the Blair Project. It is a lie that has taken many shapes and forms but here are a few.

It begins with the culture of spin. The presentational and media control skills that were so important in winning the 1997 and 2001 elections have worn thin. Alaistair Campbell and Peter Mandelson have fallen from grace, but their legacy is one of deceit and cynicism. As perhaps never before no one believes a word that any politician utters, including themselves, judging by the way they constantly try to wriggle out of the traps they have set for themselves.

There is the lie that New Labour has a progressive agenda, that it seeks to work for the good of the many not the few. Meanwhile salary differentials and inequalities continue to increase, and the super rich prosper as never before. Recent changes to the income tax regime certainly fail to indicate a passion to benefit the poorest workers. The minimum wage and tax credits seem to have been helpful, though recent reports suggest more children trapped in poverty that elsewhere in Europe and the brunt of poverty wages and exploitation is now borne by expendable European migrant labour.

There is the lie that New Labour supports and invests in the public sector. Money may have gone in, but most of the effort has been to recruit and empower high paid managers and accountants. In truth most of the staff of the great statutory agencies are alienated by the slavery of target driven management, the devaluing of professional skills and expertise, the outsourcing to low paying private companies, and the general squeeze on pay and working conditions. And just ask someone from Preston how hard it is to find a local NHS dentist who will take new patients!

There is the lie of the new Labour mantra about rights and responsibilities. As I wrote ten years ago there is some good sense and Christian foundations to the political philosophy of communitarianism on which these arguments are based. But it has been transmuted into an oppressive regime where ordinary people are increasingly policed and under surveillance to impose responsibilities and increasingly rights are taken away. There is a coercive model of what constitutes the good active citizen, the adequate parent, the safe employer, the local community or faith group with which the state can engage. Yet at the same time despite human rights legislation, rights to privacy, independence and even freedom of belief and conscience are being taken away. The war on terrorism is used as a smoke screen to increase surveillance, bring in biometric ID cards, and reduce the right of habeas corpus. Meanwhile the big global corporations and anyone with lots of money is rarely challenged about responsibilities, and seem to have increased rights to make more money, influence government and (alledgedly) to buy peerages.

There is the lie about being tough on crime and the causes of crime which was the catch phrase of the earlier Tony Blair. Want seems to have happened is that New Labour has widened the definition of crime, criminalized and locked up record high numbers of people (mainly young working class and ethnic minority men) and invented the category of Anti social behaviour to allow more people to be treated as criminal and excluded without the need for judicial process. More young people feel more alienated, and it’s not surprising they wear hoodies, distrust authority and in some cases turn to armed violence. There is little attempt to understand the causes of crime, and the probation service which traditionally had that role has been left with offender management and risk containment, is driven by irrelevant, unachievable and trivial targets, has a work force who are de skilled and demoralized, and is heading for privatization. Fear of crime seems greater than ever and community policing where it succeeds in engaging established older residents encourages lynch mob mentality.

Then there is the biggest lie of all the war in Iraq. It is bad enough that in ten years Blair has committed UK troops to numerous international conflicts more regularly than any other recent PM. But who would have believed that in 2003 a Labour government, following the lead from a right wing neo conservative, US President, and despite the opposition on the streets of millions of concerned citizens would invade a middle Eastern state on the back of a propaganda campaign about non-existent weapons of mass destruction that could be used against us within hours! If this was a genuine mistake on the part of the intelligence services then they and their political masters ought to be sacked. If it was not a genuine mistake then the deceit is monstrous, causing hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths and suffering. If the war had been portrayed as an honest attempt to overthrow a tyrannical brutal dictator, even a pacifist might have tolerated it. Even an explanation that the west needed to secure oil supplies would have been more honest. Four years since the invasion the war continues in much more chaotic ways and it seems impossible to find an exit stratgegy.

For these and other lies I shall be glad to see Tony Blair go. In 1997 his message was “Trust me”. He has betrayed that trust, and as a result my and many other people’s trust in politicians has evaporated. For the rest of my life I shall be in active opposition to the Labour Party to which I once belonged. When Thatcher was in power I knew there was an alternative. These days, this side of heaven at least, I am not so sure.

Both Tony Blair and George Bush have publicly declared their Christian faith. We can only hope for their sake that God, who knows and sees all things, and represents perfect justice, will be more generous in his judgment than I have been, and more lenient than He was with Ananias and Sapphira.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

MARCH MONEY MADNESS

It's the last week of March, the end of the government financial year and most people in the public sector, and voluntary organisations like ours who draw down public money are rushing around like the proverbial blue-bottled fly trying to spend every last penny of their budget before the hour glass runs out.

We've got two projects where we've got money to spare and to spend this week..

Our garden project has been given £4000 by the County Council for which we are very grateful. But actually it seems they were bending over backwards to get rid of the money before the end of the financial year... And we've done our best to spend it for them and work is going on this week, and plants have been bought and wait to be delivered..And thankfully we are not being pursued too hard to make sure every receipt or invoice is dated before 1st April.


Our other project is a computer suite where we have put together a complex funding package from SRB6 and the Safer and Stronger Communities Fund Actually it is a very exciting project and again we are grateful for all the funding we can get.

There really is a bit of madness in this as the first funder is only supporting us for next year (07/08) while the second is offering matched funding from this year's budget (06/07). This means that we have had to spend £5k on equipment this month and submit claim forms and invoices, while the actual installation of the computer suite to make sense of the whole project cannot start till April 1st and will have to be claimed for in the first quarter of next year. And the same goes for the output monitoring, we have to write in the figure 1 four times in a spreadsheet for the SSCF claim to show that we had a target and achiecved it for the last quarter of 06/07 which actually amounted spending the money to buy some cameras and computer equipment. The reality is the government does not believe anything exists unless you can count it (and I'm told a tick in the box won't do as apparently the Treasury can't handle binary maths!)

In our case and with lots of other voluntary agencies we haven't yet officially heard whether revenue grant applications to fund next years salaries are coming through. So we have a double madness of frantic last minute capital spending while people on short term contracts are leaving their jobs or being made redundant at the end of their project

At the same time other public sector bodies such as hospitals have already spent all their dosh for this year and are having to cancel operations.

Surely there must be a more rational and sustainable way of funding public sector programmes and voluntary sector projects. Still I suppose the present regime does keep accountants and auditors in work on a long term basis!!!!

Why are some Christians so Islamaphobic?

I just received this chain email ... about the mosque in West Ham which is in the headlines in London.... I've reordered the sections so it makes sense sequentially ending with the responses I've made to the friend who sent it to me and to Alan Craig in Newham...

I find it alarming that Christians react in this way....

Apparently there is a SE London network of evangelicals at the root of it

Nick Wynne-Jones [mailto:
nwwj@ccb.org.uk] is something to do with Christ Church Beckenham and has to bear responsibility for spreading what must be a false statement that Ken Livingstone is planning to use tax payer's money to build an enormous mosque costing an estimated 100M in the docklands

and nelsonp@ntlworld.com (see his disclaimer right at the bottom of his email)

I think they need a rebuke!

If you check the Evening Standard article (by Mira Bar-Hillel .. )

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23390637-details/Unelected+quango+to+decide+on+mosque+for+Olympic+site/article.do

they are very careful to limit it to the group has been accused of drawing young men towards an extremist version of Islam.

It's clearly been a Wikipedia approach... in the sense This section does not cite its
references or sources.
But it is worth exploring for a more rounded view of Tablighi Jamaat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablighi_Jamaat





ORIGINAL EMAIL BEGINS
From: Nick Wynne-Jones [mailto:
nwwj@ccb.org.uk] Sent: 28 March 2007 10:22 To: nelsonp@ntlworld.comSubject: FW: London Olympics & Mosque - please voteImportance: High
Dear Nelson
I have received this and thought it would be something on which members of your circulation list might wish to express their concern through voting.
Every blessing
Nick


(NO SOURCE IS GIVEN for this) I don't know if you have heard about this but Ken Livingstone is planning to use tax payer's money to build an enormous mosque costing an estimated 100M in the docklands. What do you think about it? Wouldn't it be better to spend the money on a new hospital or improved transport facilities?? Bigger than St Paul's! The plan is for the mosque to be so big that people flying in from all over the world for the 2012 Olympics will it see it as the biggest landmark in London, bigger than St Pauls, Westminster Abbey or Wembley Stadium

Take a second to cast your vote in The Evening Standard on-line poll to determine public opinion about whether a mega mosque should be built for the Olympics. The vote so far is 62 % in favour. It looks like the Muslim community is casting its vote in droves, and as usual the Christians are burying their heads in the sand....

After voting, forward this to as many people as you can. Here's the link:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/poll/poll-18791-details/ques-18669-id/%C2%A3100m+mosque:+Vote+now/poll.do


---------- THIS IS THE Forwarded message That came with the first email ----------
From: Nelson Pallister <nelsonp@ntlworld.com>Date: 28-Mar-2007 11:17
Subject: FW: London Olympics & Mosque - please voteTo: Nelson Pallister <nelsonp@ntlworld.com>

This is the 3rd petition notice I have received and this time the link works, so I am passing it on.
I was present recently at a debate in the House of Lords on Religious Freedom with particular reference to the right to change one's religion. Alan Craig, the Christian Alliance Councillor from Newham, was speaking on the issue of the mosque. He said he gets on well with Muslims and agrees with them on many issues. However, he is opposed to the mosque for the following reasons:

1. It is very close to the West Ham Football Ground which itself creates serious traffic congestion. Another even larger building with its attendant traffic generation will be very disruptive for the area.
2. A massive mosque right at the entrance to the Olympic Stadium would send a message to the world (think of all the TV coverage including views from the air) that Britain is now a Muslim nation.
3. There is already evidence of Muslims moving into the area to be near the mosque and this could create a ghetto-like area (contrary to Olympic principles).
4. The particular Muslim sect (linked to the Wahibi sect) takes an isolationist, separatist stance and has a history of radicalising young Muslims.
5. This sect has its UK HQ in Dewsbury where they have created a separatist parallel society and structure intent on imposing shari'a law in their part of the town. It has become quite intimidating for anyone not associated with the sect to even walk in the street.

Alan Craig said that in Newham 2500 had signed a petition against the mosque and many of those were in fact Muslims. Further questions that could be asked include:

How many women are there on the management committee?
How many Muslim women competitors are there in the Olympics?
How much of the funding for the sect comes from Saudi Arabia (not necessarily from the Government but from other sources there)?
Can people carry a Bible down Riyadh High Street? (There was recently a case where an Air Stewardess was not even allowed by a British airline to take her Bible with her when flying to Saudi Arabia.)

I am not sure about Ken Livingstone using taxpayers' money. Is this correct?

Nelson
I have undertaken to become a distribution point for information of interest to the Churches in Orpington and if appropriate to people in a wider area. I always distribute using the "bcc" option so that no-one's email address is passed on. People wanting to inform others of Inter-church events contact me and if I consider it appropriate, I pass the information on. I do so in good faith, expecting that those who initiate the communication will have ensured accuracy and that all other interests will have been considered. Occasionally I have information that applies to a wider audience than just Orpington and area and I will extend the distribution. If anyone does not want to receive these communications, please ask me to remove you from my distribution list. Please bear in mind, however, that removal from a list means that no communication relating to matters of even more limited interest may be sent to you.
Nelson D A Pallister 07956 237152 Fax: 01689 602961 Email:
nelsonp@ntlworld.com

my response to the friend who sent it...

Dear A***
Please do not circulate this sort of thing assuming it is innocent Christian comment... there are political and possibly racist implications very near the surface. It is positively dangerous to egg on Christians and encourage their persecution complex in this way given the polarised nature of communities in Preston and Lancashire.

Alan Craig is an old acquaintance of mine from Newham. I believe Alan is an honourable and sincere Christian guy though I have often disagreed with him and been on opposite sides of political struggles to him in the past. I would take everything he says with a very large pillar of salt! While there are some valid points in the questions he poses these should be asked in face to face dialogue with Muslim leaders, rather than in the megaphone atmosphere of the Evening Standard and internet petitions.

On facts as I understand it
1) the mosque is over a mile from the current WH U F C ground.
2) It is also a mile or two from the proposed Olympic stadium
3:) The area has had a significant Muslim population for well over 30 years and the growth of the Muslim population has resulted from three things, a) the flight of white people including Christians away from the area b) young age structure and high fertility rates in the local Bangladeshi and Pakistani population c) some recent migration into the area of Muslim people from other overseas countries and to some extent from within the UK.

It would probably be illegal for the mayor of London to use tax payers money to build any place of worship..in any religion.. Any subsidy can only be given in the form of regeneration funding for social action or social welfare projects which are open to all as we have received as Christians both in this our Project and in the case of yours! .

In the history of this mosques application for planning permission which goes back ovesidy for 10 years there was a point when Newham Council actually asked the mosque for several million pounds subsidy for the renovation of the derelict River Lea waterfront which adjoins their sight.

If Christians want freedom of religion in this country we should avoid knee jerk reactions like this, at least check our facts to ensure we are not bearing false witness against our neighbours, and be arguing for freedom of religion and justice for our Muslim neighbours


Greg Smith



What I wrote to Alan Craig was this

Dear Alan
I hope you and yours are well... and that life in Newham is good... If you read through the thread of Email correspondence below you'll see a complex chain of how something you said arrived up here on the Christian grapevine and in my view as a result of "Chinese whispers" (sorry for the non PC term) has become in my view quite dangerous for inter community harmony in Lancashire..

It's not absolutely clear to me what are your words and what others have added..

You won't I think be surprised I disagree with some of your views... and it would be great to debate face to face on some of them like we used to...I'll admit you do pose some important questions.. and I hope I haven't been to hard on you or unfair in my critique.. And I hope I have got my facts right now I'm out of touch with the Newham context... I certainly uphold your right to say these sort of things...and in the public domain if you feel it necessary.. In fact it's not you I'm angry about.. but the naievity of understanding of many Christians who pick up and pass on these things as part of their "martyr complex"...and nostalgia for the days of Empire....

We've actually got a similar planning dispute running over a mosque development in Preston at the moment..in a white upper middle class neighbourhood a conservation area like the woodgrange estate.. And while the car parking and architectural blending issues have come to the fore, it has also brought out the BNP racist tribes in leafleting and the local press...which I think you would agree we can do without...

Of course the answer to the parking problem in Newham is for the Hammers to get relegated to the Conference (as they may well be soon!) and for Kingsway and Glory House to move out to Essex!! as I understand the former will be doing..

Meanwhile I will of course vote in favour of the mosque development!

Shalom Greg Smith

Monday, March 12, 2007

71000 Duke of Gloucester Cumbrian Tour 10th March 2007

Crossing the Kent viaduct between Arnside and Grange over Sands




BIKES FOR SALE

Pinarello Road Bike, small frame, suitable for 8 -13 year old taking up competitive cycling, Preston area, will accept offers around £180

Also very basic tandem, suit one average adult and one small adult or child. In need of some attention will accept offers around £120

And Girl's Mountain bike suit 10 year old: £30

Contact : greg3@maister-smith.fsnet.co.uk /01772 827987

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Light and Shape : Preston UCLAN March 2nd 2007





Tulketh Mill Preston

Saturday March 2nd 2007.. 4;30pm.. the light was great, the building left over from the age of cotton mills is now a call centre for Carphone Warehouse.




Canalside Photos Hebden Bridge



check out the location at http://www.hebdenbridge.co.uk/tourist-info/

Dipper on Hebden Water

I was really lucky to get these pictures of one of my favourite birds on February 24th near Hebden Bridge West Yorks. If you want to know more about the species click
http://www.rspb.org.uk/birds/guide/d/dipper/index.asp


Thursday, March 01, 2007

Voluntary Sector is "full up"?

BBC web site reports http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6402965.stm


The government has won a vote over plans to privatise the Probation Service, despite a backbench revolt. MPs voted 293 to 268 in favour of the Offender Management Bill - cutting the government's majority from 62 to 25. Critics said letting firms and voluntary groups in England and Wales run services would increase reoffending rates and destroy "local connections".

When one’s partner is someone who has worked as a probation officer for over 20 years waking up to this news is not a pleasant experience, as it was me and the dog that were lightning conductors for anger directed at John Reid and the stupid government..

But the issue it raises for me is where will the governments expectations of the voluntary sector end? In one area after another they are looking to the third sector, the voluntary, community and faith groups to take on work loads, and compete for contracts that in previous times were seen as the natural task for the local or national state.

My own local experience in this sector is suggesting that we ought to recognize there is an absolutely limited capacity in the sector to do any more and that before long we shall need to put up signs saying “sector full up” or “services suspended due to staff shortages”.

For example I was at a local neighbourhood management board this week, trying with others to move forward co-ordinated local regeneration action and service delivery. While I find this commendable in terms of the desire to collaborate and implement joined up planning, and in the desire to give local residents a voice in the way their locality develops, the practical reality is somewhat different. There were about 15 (good and committed) people in the room. Four or five were local residents although two of them draw a salary from an organisation working in the area, which is largely funded out of the public purse and were there in work time. The rest were all employees of statutory bodies or their arms length agencies, including the police, the city council, two registered social landlords, an FE college, and SRB funded community projects. Only three people were giving unpaid voluntary service in attending this meeting, although at least 10,000 local residents would be eligible to be involved in the process of neighbourhood management. Community meetings in this city typically follow this pattern, despite calls for widening participation in volunteering and community governance, there appears to be a small pool of “active citizens” sometimes known as “usual suspects”, and most of them are paid.

For those involved in the Third Sector research and policy making it poses these key questions:

1. Do we have a clear definition of what “voluntary action” means and an understanding that much of what goes on in the “voluntary sector” is no longer truly “voluntary”?

2. Are there measurable limits to the quantity of voluntary action or potential volunteer hours available within the population of the UK and in the context of other demands on peoples time, (e.g. earning a living, caring for self and family, being a consumer, leisure and entertainment) are we nearing that limit? Is any one (Institute of Volunteering Research??) doing research on this?

3. Given the wide range of opportunities for unpaid contributions to the community which choices do volunteers make? My impression is that lots of people offer time in sports clubs, in religious groups, in some campaigns, in fund raising drives and in some hobby and leisure groups, but that apart from the few “usual suspects” most are reluctant to engage in neighbourhood community action, in committee and trusteeship work for the sector and in anything to do with politics. I should think the data from the Home Office citizenship surveys bears this out, though I haven’t had time to check it.

One final thought with Red Nose Day coming up. I wonder if in our celebrity and consumer culture we are seeing a phenomenon of “vicarious volunteering”. In sociology of religion Grace Davie and others have argued that the typical form of English religion in the late 20th Century was “vicarious Christianity”. People believed in a vague way but didn’t bother to belong to a church or take an active role, or give more than a few pence, but expected the church to be there to pray for them to christen, marry and bury people as necessary and to offer practical help in time of need. How far is it the case that the general public feel warm that Lenny Henry, Bob Geldorf and their mates organise TV charitythons, might give a few hours of their time and a couple of quid to the collection, but are really quite relieved that a few other people are paid to deliver charitable service to the homeless, the refugees, the children with cancer and leaning difficulties? Is anyone doing current research on the contemporary culture of charity and volunteering? What do you think they would discover?

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Web resources for Fundraising

Hope these links are useful

FunderFinder is a small UK charity producing software and other resources, mainly for grant-seekers. Some of the things produced are free, some cost - though many people use the software we sell at no cost in a library or resource agency. ..... specialise in information and advice about charitable trusts and foundations that fund in the UK.
http://www.funderfinder.org.uk/index.php

The premier online database of UK sponsorship opportunities
http://www.uksponsorship.com/

Fundraising UK Ltd is the UK's leading Internet fundraising consultancy. Founded in 1996 by Howard Lake, it helps charities in the UK and internationally to use the Internet as a fundraising tool to enhance and extend their existing fundraising activities.
http://www.fundraising.co.uk/index.php

=
The Association of Charitable Foundations (ACF) is the UK wide support organisation for grant-making trusts and foundations of all types. the ACF website does not contain any information about ACF members, other than links to their sites
http://www.acf.org.uk/linkstrusts.htm

Although Voluntary Arts England itself is not a grant-making body, this section of the site aims to give you the advice and guidance you need when seeking or applying for funds.
http://www.vaengland.org.uk/cgi-bin/website.cgi?tier1=england&tier2=funding&fp=true

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

More on equality diversity and monolithic uniformity

Well I thought I would provoke a debate and for the most part I think I provoked a reaction!

posting my piece to the VSSN list has generated a thread of nearly a dozen replies! you can read them in the archives at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A1=ind0701&L=vol-sector-studies-network

This is my response

If you read carefully what I was trying to say the "problem" is not gay adoptions or equal rights for gay couples, but whether government should impose a monolithic model of provision of any service on a sector which by nature includes a wide diversity of groups, with strongly held values.

Tony Hermann latched on to this in a most helpful way and the example of the diverse translation services and the pragmatic solution is an excellent one. In the real world of course this pattern of service operating through consumer choice will lead to de facto discrimination

In the same way I would support state funding of various telephone help line services for particular niche markets, e.g. one for women at risk of domestic violence, child line and a gay and lesbian help line. And of course similar patterns do occur in the case of state aided faith based schools, or the tax relief given to almost every religious congregation and place of worship even though membership is only open (either de jure or de facto) to those who share particular beliefs and rituals.

So why do secular equal rights activists want to impose uniformity on religious groups who have a conscience on particular issues that are not shared by the whole of society..?

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Equality Law Contradicts Diversity Policy

The decision by the UK government not to allow an exemption on the regulations on gay adoptions seems to me a perverse and dangerous one, threatening the whole concept of the independence of civil society organisations who work from a strong value base... For the full news story see the Guardian article at.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2001834,00.html#article_continue

It doesn’t really matter what one thinks of the RC church and its supporters who included the two Anglican Archbishops in general, or in the case of this political protest. My view (as I’ve already blogged) is that this was the wrong (minor) issue for Christians to get fundamentalist about. The reality is that the secular fundamentalists have imposed their will in a manner which has rarely been seen since the French Revolution or the demise of Joseph Stalin.

I never feel comfortable to be in agreement with Ann Widdecome but this time I am. According to the daily Telegraph

the former Home Office minister, said she was not surprised that Mr Cameron had not intervened in the debate so far but added: "I would hope that he will come out in favour of freedom of conscience. "It’s one thing to say that gay people can adopt and quite another to say they must be able to adopt from a specific agency. It’s like saying someone not only has the right to have an abortion but they also have the right to demand an abortion from a specific doctor, regardless of that doctor’s freedom of conscience."

There is a supreme irony in that it was the secular enlightenment that fully developed the idea of diversity and toleration in civil society, though its roots in England go back to the religious tradition of Christian Dissent. Voltaire I think it was who said "I may disagree with your belief but I will fight to the death for your right to believe it". But now the state seems to be saying that all religious and voluntary groups must believe in and practice equality as set out in the law, even if this is anathema to the individual and group conscience.

There seems then to be an inherent contradiction, or at least tension, between the diversity and equality agendas. We are still encouraged to celebrate diversity and ensure public services reach all sections of society. I was at a seminar today where the local NHS mental health service for children and adolescents was enthusiastically trying to communicate with, learn from, and build partnership with, the representatives of many of the diverse faith communities in the city. But we can only wonder if clergy and religious youth workers really are going to be allowed to counsel and work with youngsters with clinical depression along cultural and faith lines they are familiar with, or whether the state is going to step in and insist on some treatment with some universal Prozac.

The other current example of this state control freakery is around the social cohesion agenda. Multiculturalism is being attacked from all sides and the very ideology that led to gay pride is overwhelmed by the revived rhetoric of citizenship and integration. Only the not so new Labour government seems to be able to determine what is appropriate and permitted behaviour for the “good” British citizen. Implicitly their definition means you can’t be a committed Muslim, a faithful Catholic, a born again Christian or even a Scots Nationalist and still remain a true Briton. Still less can you be an asylum seeker or refugee, a hoodie, a kid who hangs out on street corners etc. But apparently you can be a casino entrepreneur, an arms trader paying bribes to secure business, or David Beckham, and still present a perfect image of a good citizen. There is either a whiff of hypocrisy or a corruption of values in this approach.

One can understand why a government so desperate to retain votes goes down this route as they continue to listen to polls and focus groups. In a post 9/11 context, in response to the discontents of globalization, in the maelstrom of diverse and ever changing social identities many in the mainstream feel insecure, and clutch for straws of imagined traditional certainties. And it is the mainstream groups that swing elections. Of course the media, especially the tabloids develop the theme. Or more often trivialize it around celebrities as in the recent Celebrity Big Brother case.. see http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,1994828,00.html And the politicians give us all a pat on the back for our supposed “tolerance” as a Great British virtue.

It is very disheartening that a government who for ten years have been pushing the benefits of partnerships involving faith communities and religious social welfare organisations should have ended up like this. Perhaps it always was a sham and they only wanted to take us over on their secular terms. There have been plenty of policy reports that have picked up the issues and tensions that were unresolved in these policy areas and in my view the policy makers just haven’t understood.

Faced with a strengthened secular establishment what are churches and value based groups going to do? Inevitably some will continue to sup with the devil as government funding is the only way their organizations can survive? Others will try to remain in critical solidarity, at least on the issues that they agree with the government, but I suspect will find it increasingly difficult to remain true to their own ethos. And some will decide on the purist option refusing to take government money with strings attached and closing down some of their services. A few may even decide to carry on in their own sweet way, either retreating into their own silo, or engaging in various levels of civil disobedience.

The law of unintended consequences will surely apply. In seeking to impose equality the government is attacking liberty, and fracturing fraternity/ community. The very policies they see as enhancing social cohesion and building social capital are leading to even lower levels of trust and fragmentation.