But look at it today 3 months on...

There has been some deliberate damage with some plants ripped up.. probabbly by bored and possibly drunken people.. And maybe the choice of plants and quality of weed root removal was not good when the work was done
But the real problem is lack of maintenance... Why?
Because it was a short term project... Groundwork's funding came to an end on March 31st. and their staff are no longer around.. In an ideal world they would have left behind a community group to look after the place... But why should anyone want to work hard gardening a public space when we pay the Council to do that and we are all busy anyway? And the community development was just not done in the original project.
Formally the city council has the responsibility for maintaining the area.. But they are always and increasingly hard pressed for staff and funds.. If its not a high prestige area then they are going to neglect it.
So its yet another example of a short term scheme based on funny regeneration money ending up being a waste of effort, because there was no continuation funding...

1 comment:
Just seeing the word 'Groundwork' in the heading told me the story before I read it. How this organisation gets money for such schemes that are clearly a waste of money baffles me. I have worked with them on various projects in Doncaster and Leeds and their community consultation, involvement and development struggles to rise to the level of tokenistic. It is all so much worse since this park is now a living example of despair, of hopes raised and shattered.
David Arscott
Post a Comment